REPRESENTATIVE CASES

Konrad Sherinian has appeared as lead counsel in numerous cases, including more than 100 cases in various Federal Courts. He has consulted on a substantial number of additional cases. Below is a representative listing of cases that Konrad litigated along with a brief description of the subject matter and results.

Intellectual Property

2021 – Present International Star Registry of Illinois v. RGIFTS et al.:

2017 – 2018 Segerdahl v. Ferruzza et al.: Represented former employee of plaintiff in a trade secret lawsuit. The case was settled advantageously for the represented defendant in 2018, and is still pending as of late 2021 against other defendants.

 2018 – 2019 National Hockey League v. The Hockey Cup LLC: Represented defendant in trademark infringement suit. Case was settled with payment from defendant’s insurer; defendant was allowed to sell all remaining product and keep all profits.

 2016 Tecmen Electronics v. Menard: Defended Menards against an accusation of patent infringement. The matter was settled advantageously for Menards shortly after filing.

 Polaris Industries et al. v. Nouis Technologies: Represented Nouis Technologies in litigation before the Western District of Wisconsin as well as before the Patent Trials and Appeals Board (PTAB), which denied Polaris’s petition on all grounds.

 Burberry Limited v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A: Burberry sued Music Lily, a music retailer, for counterfeiting based on false information provided by an unknown individual. The case was settled advantageously for Music Lily, which regained access to its Pay Pal account, and avoided having a preliminary injunction entered against it.

 Walgreen v. Toy Century: Represented Toy Century against Walgreen in a case involving alleged lead paint on toy cars. The matter settled favorably shortly before trial.

 Narada Systems v. Tabula: Represented Narada Systems in a patent infringement suit to enforce U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,504,786, 6,901,070, and 7,236,488, which cover various improved routing and switching technologies. The case was settled advantageously for Narada.

 United Skys v. CPI Daylighting: Represented United Skys in a trade secret action against CPI Daylighting to recover for CPI’s misappropriation of United Skys’s trade secrets and to quell CPI’s accusations that United Skys misappropriated CPI’s trade secrets. The case was settled advantageously for United Skys.

 A&R Collectibles v. A Christmas Story House: Represented A&R Collectibles in a suit to recover damages incurred due to a wrongful assertion of copyright infringement made by defendant. The case was settled advantageously for A&R.