REPRESENTATIVE CASES

Walgreen v. Toy Century: Represent Toy Century against Walgreen which has accused Toy Century of selling defective radio controlled cars.

Polaris Industries, Inc., Polaris Industries, Inc., and Polaris Industries Manufacturing, LLC v. Nouis Technologies, Inc.: Represent Nouis Technologies, Inc. in an inter partes review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,346,056, which covers fly weight technologies, before the United States Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”).

The Segerdahl Corp. d/b/a SG360° v. American Litho, Inc., et al: Represent individual defendant against trade secret, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, breach of fiduciary duty, unfair competition and other claims.

Volo Sportsplex, Inc., and A Child’s Place Day Care, Inc. v. Bee-Line Communications, Inc., and Stacey McClenathan: Represented the plaintiffs to prosecute their breach of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, tortious interference with business relationships, and breach of contract claims. Settled the case after discovery.

Richard Perez v. William Schueler: Represent the plaintiff Richard Perez in a medical malpractice case.

Frank Staggs v. Robert Kaplinsky, David Rebuck and UroPartners, LLC: Represent the plaintiff Frank Staggs in the medical malpractice case.

Volo Sportsplex, Inc. and A Child’s Place Day Care Inc. v. Bee-Line Communications, Inc. and Stacey McClenathan: Represent the plaintiffs to enforce their contractual rights and prosecute their claims under Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA).

Robert Estrada v. Anna Loenkamp at al: Represented Robert Estrada to recover damages for personal injuries suffered in an auto collision accident. Successfully reached a settlement for Mr. Estrada.

Nouis Technologies, Inc. v. Polaris Industries, Inc., Polaris Industries, Inc., and Polaris Industries Manufacturing, LLC: Represent Nouis Technologies, Inc. in a patent infringement suit to enforce U.S. Pat. No. 6,346,056, which covers fly weight technologies.

Methode Electronics v. Wensheng Weng: Represent Defendant Wensheng Weng in a lawsuit filed by his former employer that seeks to force him to assign a patent that he filed for and obtained after being terminated by the former employer.

Narada Systems v. Tabula: Represent Narada Systems in a patent infringement suit to enforce U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,504,786, 6,901,070, and 7,236,488, which cover various improved routing and switching technologies.

Dragon Bleu v. VENM: Represent Trademark Applicant VENM in an Opposition proceeding filed by Dragon Bleu.

A&R Collectibles v. A Christmas Story House: Represent A&R Collectibles in a suit to recover damages incurred due to a wrongful assertion of copyright infringement made by defendant.

Golf Simulator v. Bogies Indoor Golf Club: Represent plaintiff Golf Simulator to enforce its patent covering improvements in golf simulator technology.

Brandon Wade Licensing v. Steed Media: Represent a well-known photographer in enforcing his copyright in a picture that was posted on a website without license.

Brandon Wade Licensing v. TerezOwens.com: Represent a well-known photographer in enforcing his copyright in a picture that was posted on a website without license, and with a fake watermark.

Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation v. Mary Kerlin and Mangy Dawg, LLC: Represent Slep-Tone to enforce its trademarks.

Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation v. Denny Case: Represent Slep-Tone to enforce its trademarks.

Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Xia Yu et al: Represent Chinese online sellers against Deckers Outdoor which has accused the Chinese online sellers of trademark infringement and counterfeiting, false designation of origin and violation of Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

GS Hoslistic, LLC v. Shejin Technology Co., LTD et al: Represent Chinese online sellers against GS Hoslistic which has accused the Chinese online sellers of trademark infringement and counterfeiting, false designation of origin and violation of Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Levi Strauss Co. v. Shengli2985 Store et al: Represent Chinese online sellers against Levi Strauss which has accused the Chinese online sellers of trademark infringement and counterfeiting, false designation of origin and violation of Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Luxottica Group S.p.A. v. Shou Liang et al: Represent Chinese online sellers against Luxottica which has accused the Chinese online sellers of trademark infringement and counterfeiting, false designation of origin and violation of Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

H-D U.S.A. LLC v. Zhang Ying et al: Represent Chinese online sellers against H-D which has accused the Chinese online sellers of trademark infringement and counterfeiting, false designation of origin and violation of Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Monster Energy Company v. Zheng Peng et al: Represent Chinese online sellers against Monster which has accused the Chinese online sellers of trademark infringement and counterfeiting, false designation of origin and violation of Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Kiel James Patrick LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A: Represent Chinese online sellers against Kiel James which has accused the Chinese online sellers of trademark infringement and counterfeiting, false designation of origin and violation of Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

LVMH Swiss Manufactures SA and Hublot SA v. Yi Me He et al: Represent Chinese online sellers against LVMH which has accused the Chinese online sellers of trademark infringement and counterfeiting, false designation of origin and violation of Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and The Black & Decker Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A: Represent Chinese online sellers against Stanley which has accused the Chinese online sellers of trademark infringement and counterfeiting, false designation of origin and violation of Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Bulgari, S.p.A. v. Zhi Xin Liao et al: Represent Chinese online sellers against Bulgari which has accused the Chinese online sellers of trademark infringement and counterfeiting, false designation of origin and violation of Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Canada Goose Inc. v. Zhang Yiyi et al: Represent Chinese online sellers against Canada Goose which has accused the Chinese online sellers of trademark infringement and counterfeiting, false designation of origin and violation of Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Calvin Klein Trademark Trust, et al v. Zhou Ping et al: Represent Chinese online sellers against Calvin Klein which has accused the Chinese online sellers of trademark infringement and counterfeiting, false designation of origin and violation of Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Otter Products, LLC v. 2015Outlets4U et al: Represent Chinese online sellers against Otter Products which has accused the Chinese online sellers of trademark infringement and counterfeiting, false designation of origin and violation of Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Chrome Hearts LLC v. Chen Lifang et al: Represent Chinese online sellers against Chrome Hearts which has accused the Chinese online sellers of trademark infringement and counterfeiting, false designation of origin and violation of Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Fitness Anywhere LLC v. Gao Xu et al: Represent Chinese online sellers against Fitness Anywhere which has accused the Chinese online sellers of trademark infringement and counterfeiting, false designation of origin and violation of Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Richemont International SA, Cartier International A.G.,Montblanc-Simplo GMBH, Chloe S.A.S., Van Cleef & Arpels SA, Officine Panerai A.G., and Lancel International SA v. Zhang Ming et al: Represent Chinese online sellers against the plaintiffs which has accused the Chinese online sellers of trademark infringement and counterfeiting, false designation of origin and violation of Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

NU Image, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A: Represent Chinese online sellers against NU Image which has accused the Chinese online sellers of trademark infringement and counterfeiting, false designation of origin and violation of Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. v. Li HuanHuan et al: Represent Chinese online sellers against Lululemon which has accused the Chinese online sellers of trademark infringement and counterfeiting, false designation of origin and violation of Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

David Gilmour Music Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A: Represent Chinese online sellers against David Gilmore Music Ltd. which has accused the Chinese online sellers of trademark infringement and counterfeiting, false designation of origin and violation of Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Western Digital Technologies, Inc. v. chengsky2013 et al: Represent Chinese online sellers against Western Digital which has accused the Chinese online sellers of trademark infringement and counterfeiting, false designation of origin and violation of Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Christian Dior Couture, S.A. v. Zhao Feng et al: Represent Chinese online sellers against Christian Dior Couture which has accused the Chinese online sellers of trademark infringement and counterfeiting, false designation of origin and violation of Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

NBA Properties, Inc., MLB Advanced Media, L.P., Major League Baseball Properties, Inc.,NHL Enterprises, L.P., Collegiate Licensing Company, LLC, and Auburn University v. Zhou Yan et al: Represent Chinese online sellers against NBA and other plaintiffs which has accused the Chinese online sellers of trademark infringement and counterfeiting, false designation of origin and violation of Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Patagonia, Inc. v. Jianping Lin et al: Represent Chinese online sellers against Patagonia which has accused the Chinese online sellers of trademark infringement and counterfeiting, false designation of origin and violation of Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

MCM Holding AG v. Zhang Ming et al: Represent Chinese online sellers against MCM which has accused the Chinese online sellers of trademark infringement and counterfeiting, false designation of origin and violation of Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

River Light V, L.P. and Tory Burch LLC v. Zhang Ming et al: Represent Chinese online sellers against River Light and Tory Burch which has accused the Chinese online sellers of trademark infringement and counterfeiting, false designation of origin and violation of Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Burberry Limited et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations: Represent one Chinese online seller against Burberry Limited (UK and Burberry Limited (New York) which has accused the Chinese online seller of trademark infringement and counterfeiting, false designation of origin and violation of Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A: Represented defendant Eddiestore2008 to defend the trademark infringement and counterfeiting claims. Our representation led to significantly less damage amount.